But I bet the effect is strange for a second viewer who sits still while the badge wearer roams around.
Posted at 11:07 am on Apr 16th, 2010 by Paul"
I had exactly the same thought as I watched the demonstration. Also, what would happen if there was more than one badge in the space? Would the image perspective change based on which wearer was closer to the receiver? Or would the system crash?
I do love the concept, but wish it could be more practically implemented without having to build a new exterior wall set a few feet back from the existing windows and screening a continuous loop landscape film or real-time video feed.
"Neat.
ReplyDeleteBut I bet the effect is strange for a second viewer who sits still while the badge wearer roams around.
Posted at 11:07 am on Apr 16th, 2010 by Paul"
I had exactly the same thought as I watched the demonstration. Also, what would happen if there was more than one badge in the space? Would the image perspective change based on which wearer was closer to the receiver? Or would the system crash?
I do love the concept, but wish it could be more practically implemented without having to build a new exterior wall set a few feet back from the existing windows and screening a continuous loop landscape film or real-time video feed.
Baby-eye-view made me smile
ReplyDeleteI bet there are perspective problems too. I expect motion sickness would be a problem.
ReplyDeleteTricky, but not imposible for an essentially motionless "outdoor" image, I'd have thought
ReplyDelete(i.e. if the framerate's fast enough, the system knows who's viewing and sets FOV to their eye-spacing/height)...