Pages

Monday, 22 November 2010

Innocent loses fight over VAT charged on smoothies – but not raw fruit | Politics | The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/nov/22/innocent-smoothies-challenge-vat-ruling
Reminds me of the Great Jaffa Cake debacle of the 1990's
Posted by at
Labels: ,

1 comment:

  1. Peter S22 November 2010 at 23:11

    "lawyers for Procter & Gamble, which makes Pringles, successfully argued against a VAT and Duties Tribunal decision that Regular Pringles were not crisps, even though it said "Potato Crisps" on the container, as their actual potato content was only 42%."

    You couldn't make this stuff up.

    Get Jimmy Doherty on the case.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)