Pages

Monday, 20 October 2008

Weird Science: Can Time Move Backwards?

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/06/weird_science_c.html

15 comments:

  1. //he may be able to solve the mystery of how these particles react thousands of miles apart//
    At best, four-dimensional thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can't get through to that link. :(

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am also unable to get through.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Strange...It was working earlier without special credentials.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If it starts like this, then I can:

    John Cramer, a physicist at the University of Washington, believes that light particles can act in reverse time, and he has compelling evidence behind his theory. Cramer is a well-respected experimental physicist with an impressive particle physics background.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Still works here... Try googling dailygalaxy - and navigate the Archives (backwards in time!) to 14 June, 2007 (or, again, backwards for you US peeps to June 14, 2007)

    http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/06/index.html

    See also: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/printer2/index.asp?ploc=t&refer=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/319367_timeguy12.html?source=rss

    ReplyDelete
  7. Navigating backwards through the archives....hm, that would be time travel, wouldn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Works on this end.

    Pretty cool stuff and it feels right on a gut level, for what that's worth.
    He wants to split particles and use entanglement to transmit information faster the light would allow using fibre optics.

    $2000.00 on Hazy Daze to win in the fourth please.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm pretty sure absinthewol's got a point (entanglement -> separated in x,y,z dimensions doesn't imply separated in *all* dimensions (including T!))

    I'm really surprised there isn't some global "bucket" of funds, bequeathed by "failed" scientists who were proven right (or Nobel-alikes), though

    ReplyDelete
  10. Funny - I can see it from home, no problems. May be a browser version issue.

    Anyway, quantum entanglement has been thought to be a game changer for quite a while. But how we actually get to use it for anything meaningful, I think we're a century at least away from that.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think I saw this week that someone's building a network based on it (? I could be wrong)
    http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&q=entanglement+network&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ln

    ReplyDelete
  12. I wonder if one of the reasons they say that the universe expansion is accelerating is that perhaps time is simply slowing down?

    Here's another question: if space itself is expanding, (not the distance, but the 'stuff between,' then how do we detect it? Does a red shift show up when the 'stuff between' gets further apart?

    And one more: how do we know that time isn't going backwards already and space is collapsing into a big crunch?

    It all hurts my head...

    ReplyDelete
  13. The explananation I heard once was to imagine living on a balloon which is being inflated (draw dots on one, and inflate).
    Each point moves away from the rest. So, yes. measure the distance from any source and see it's all increasing. red->away, blue->towards.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Until the balloon bursts, and it all becomes a shriveled, crinkled, layered Proust-ian remembrance of things past. Not unlike a condom, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ah, now we're talking big BANG

    ReplyDelete